The Largest Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit Settlements Revealed

In recent years, transvaginal mesh implants have sparked a contentious legal battle, symbolizing the struggles of numerous women in the United States and beyond. These implants have gained popularity not only in the USA but also in European countries.

According to BBC, over two decades, more than 100,000 women in the UK received transvaginal mesh implants. This was primarily to address pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, often following childbirth, with 20,000 of these cases occurring in Scotland.

Initially hailed as a remedy for these conditions, the implants have resulted in severe complications for many recipients. This has led to a surge in lawsuits aimed at holding manufacturers accountable for the harm inflicted.

Among these legal proceedings, several high-profile settlements have garnered attention for their magnitude and impact. In this article, we explore the three largest transvaginal mesh lawsuit settlements in the U.S.

Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon Settlement

Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon subsidiary has been embroiled in a multitude of legal battles surrounding its transvaginal mesh products. Those who have pursued legal action through the transvaginal mesh lawsuit allege complications such as mesh erosion and organ perforation among others.

Lawsuits contend that J&J was aware of these problems but failed to disclose them. Despite undisclosed specifics, Ethicon has chosen to settle groups of cases with individual law firms following setbacks in several key trials.

In 2013, a notable instance occurred when a New Jersey jury awarded a substantial $11 million verdict against Ethicon. The case involved its Gynecare Prolift mesh, highlighting the severity of the injuries associated with the product.

Additionally, as per Consumer Notice, in February 2023, Ethicon made a significant payment of nearly $10 million. This settlement was to resolve claims brought forth by the state of Kentucky. The allegations were regarding violations of consumer protection laws due to insufficient disclosure of risks associated with surgical mesh devices.

Furthermore, Ethicon faced a formidable challenge in California, where it contested a staggering $302 million judgment related to its pelvic mesh devices. Drugwatch reports that despite Ethicon’s efforts, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the verdict in 2023, reinforcing the gravity of the situation. Presently, the legal saga continues, with 92 Ethicon cases remaining open or pending in federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) as of April 2024.

These developments underscore the enduring impact of transvaginal mesh complications and the ongoing pursuit of justice for affected individuals.

C.R. Bard

C.R. Bard, a prominent medical device company, has been at the center of controversy surrounding its transvaginal mesh products. Despite resolving many transvaginal mesh MDL cases, a group of federal cases still lingers in New Jersey multicounty litigation as of April 2024.

The company faced setbacks with significant lawsuit losses, including a $3.6 million state lawsuit in 2012 and a $2 million federal lawsuit in 2013. Bard’s settlement efforts have been notable, with agreements reached for undisclosed amounts. In October 2014, they secured a $21 million deal for over 500 lawsuits, as reported by TorHoerman Law.

However, criticism arose regarding the company’s pace in resolving cases, prompting judicial pressure to expedite settlements. In August 2015, Bard settled an additional 3,000 cases for $200 million. Additionally, in 2020, they agreed to pay $60 million to resolve vaginal mesh claims with 48 states.

American Medical Systems (AMS) Settlements

American Medical Systems, now owned by Endo International, faced many lawsuits over its transvaginal mesh products. In 2014, the company agreed to a substantial settlement of $830 million to resolve approximately 20,000 lawsuits. The settlements addressed allegations of injuries resulting from AMS’s mesh implants, including mesh erosion, infection, and painful intercourse.

Before this landmark settlement, the company had already proposed a $54.5 million settlement for an undisclosed group of cases. Drugwatch notes that Endo International, the parent company of American Medical Systems, allocated $775 million in August 2017 to settle 22,000 additional claims. In total, the company has expended approximately $2.6 billion to address its mesh-related legal liabilities.

As of April 2024, the company has not announced any further transvaginal mesh settlements. However, according to Endo International’s most recent yearly financial report, the company has liabilities totaling around $50.7 million. These liabilities are held in Qualified Settlement Funds for pelvic mesh cases in the USA. This indicates ongoing legal obligations for the company.

Also Read: Mastering the Art of Trixie Tongue Tricks


What is transvaginal mesh?

Transvaginal mesh refers to a form of surgical mesh employed in addressing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) among women. It is implanted through the vagina to provide support to weakened or damaged pelvic tissues.

Why are there lawsuits related to transvaginal mesh?

Lawsuits related to transvaginal mesh stem from reports of severe complications experienced by some women after undergoing mesh implantation. These complications may include mesh erosion, chronic pain, infection, urinary problems, and organ perforation, among others.

Who can file a transvaginal mesh lawsuit?

Anyone who has suffered harm or injury as a result of transvaginal mesh implantation may be eligible to file a lawsuit. This includes women who have experienced complications themselves, as well as family members who have lost loved ones due to complications from the mesh.

In conclusion, the largest transvaginal mesh lawsuit settlements in the U.S. represent significant milestones. They mark the ongoing battle for women’s health and accountability in the medical device industry.

These settlements underscore the profound impact of transvaginal mesh complications on the lives of affected women. They highlight the need for improved regulation, transparency, and patient care standards.

Moving forward, stakeholders must prioritize patient safety, uphold ethical standards, and ensure access to effective, low-risk treatment options. Only collective efforts can prevent similar tragedies and safeguard women’s well-being during pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence interventions.

Leave a Comment